Skip to content

docs: make outstanding issues the universal task ledger#1106

Merged
BigSimmo merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
codex/task-ledger-final-11318f
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

docs: make outstanding issues the universal task ledger#1106
BigSimmo merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
codex/task-ledger-final-11318f

Conversation

@BigSimmo

@BigSimmo BigSimmo commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • make docs/outstanding-issues.md the repository's single universal task ledger
  • add execution order, acuity, timing, estimated effort, skill/intelligence profile, dependencies, success criteria, verification, and stopping conditions for retained work
  • surface the recommended queue automatically through the repository issues hook and remove competing ledger references

Verification

  • npm run verify:pr-local — the prior feature head reached 3,240 passing tests with one 30-second timeout in tests/reconciliation-preflight.test.ts; the focused retry passed 5/5. Exact merged head is awaiting the shared heavyweight lock and protected-branch CI.
  • npm run docs:check-links
  • npm run check:skills
  • Prettier check for all changed Markdown files
  • bash -n .claude/hooks/issues-surface.sh and hook runtime smoke
  • UI verification not run: no UI, routing, styling, or browser behavior changed.
  • Release verification not run: no production or provider-backed behavior changed.

Risk and rollout

  • Risk: Low; documentation and local repository-memory workflow only.
  • Rollback: Revert the PR merge commit.
  • Provider or production effects: GitHub PR/CI/merge only; no OpenAI, Supabase, Railway, deployment, or production-data effects.

RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — documentation and local repository-memory workflow only.

Clinical Governance Preflight

Not applicable: no ingestion, answer generation, search/ranking, source rendering, document access, privacy, production environment, or clinical output behavior changed.

Notes

  • The branch includes current origin/main via an ordinary merge, with no conflicts.

Note

Low Risk
Documentation and read-only session hook behavior only; no application, auth, or provider runtime changes.

Overview
docs/outstanding-issues.md becomes the single canonical task ledger: a new Recommended execution queue (order, acuity, capability, timing, estimates, gates, verification, stop rules) plus new open rows #52#58 and issues:next-id bumped to 059.

/issues workflow is updated so reads lead with that queue; issues-surface.sh parses and prints the first eight queue rows at session start. AGENTS.md, the issues skill, and several docs (operator-backlog, production-readiness-checklist, README, codebase-index) now point status/order here instead of treating operator-backlog.md as a second ledger.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5d128a2. Configure here.

@supabase

supabase Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.


Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@BigSimmo, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 10 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 375b1c45-eed7-4065-be16-3dc8b5fc1fad

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 705480a and 8142ef6.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • .claude/hooks/issues-surface.sh
  • .claude/skills/issues/SKILL.md
  • AGENTS.md
  • docs/README.md
  • docs/branch-review-ledger.md
  • docs/codebase-index.md
  • docs/operator-backlog.md
  • docs/outstanding-issues.md
  • docs/production-readiness-checklist.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/task-ledger-final-11318f

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using default effort and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5d128a2. Configure here.

Comment thread .claude/skills/issues/SKILL.md
Comment thread .claude/hooks/issues-surface.sh

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5d128a2844

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/outstanding-issues.md Outdated

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b859572e97

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/outstanding-issues.md Outdated
@BigSimmo
BigSimmo merged commit 1391158 into main Jul 24, 2026
25 checks passed
@BigSimmo
BigSimmo deleted the codex/task-ledger-final-11318f branch July 24, 2026 00:46

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8142ef6697

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/outstanding-issues.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant